Rated 5 out of 5 stars

by pc supp on April 11, 2014 ·

... Furtherly cool would be, if: We could protect the site we "whitelisted" and are currently on and which IS secure, by BH FW especially, and also, if we could tell BH FW to block ALL content, which does not by standard flow to or from the site (or sites) we whitelisted, helpful for that is also the logging-tab we could wish for as a wishlist item, but believe me, you do not always wanna yourself look up the log tab and then enter manually all relating sites, which are connected to the site you, we, whitelisted, because it can and it mostly a LOT of other sites, mostly social net sites docked on to the site, but also ads and etc. So, an auto- option would be cool, where we can allow all "normal" (and also considered truly safe) traffic to and from our whitelisted site(s). As I said, it'd be cool, if BH FW also, on top of that, gave us all an option, by which we could simply block ALL other internet content except the whitelisted and to our whitelisted sites related secondary sites. That way, it would be the same as I already did in my pglgui in Linux, I added my own blocklist which goes from 4 times zero to four times 255, of course. I whitelist from this "true scratch and bottom", as one might call it. Some 4.2 billion IPs blocked. Normally, pglgui blocks "only" around 3 billion IPs, if all blocklists are selected. Acessing filesharing networks is definitely not possible with such strict setting, that is why it's preferrable to run a virtual machine with a less strict pglgui blocking for other than "normal" surfing.
And btw, by "protection" of our by us ourselves trusted and thus whitelisted sites, I do mean, that all other than the standard traffic from the allowed normal secondary sites IS NOT allowed and blocked. Meaning, any of those sad minority of maliciously motivated hackers or even bots would be blocked from entering the "session" we are in AT ANY site at all, allowing only us, the site, and the allowed, normal secondary sites. We could also feature a "trial run", no fear, haha no going commercial this time and not ever I hope for BH FW, LOL, no, but I mean a run, where we tell BH, what secondary sites normally dock on to our whitelisted, to be fully, entirely, protected site. It then saves those secondary site adresses, shows them to us, we can, if we want, even tick off some of them, or even all of them, which would of course be crazy, since we need at least some of them. From when we click on, it would say, your site is now fully protected against intrusions by method of IP-blockage of all other net sites, except further whitelisted elements, of course. We ourselves must be careful not to blocklist too many elements. To forego trouble, BH FW could feature profiles for blocking those and those ranges, without BH FW getting "bloated", running slowly or causing the browser, mostly firefox, to run any more slowly than normal. I did not experience ANY lag caused by BH FW, but only a drastic functionality decrease when acessing special net sites, because of which, I am taking the time to write this. Thank You, BH Firewall. Blue Hell, sounds REALLY good. Of course, there are other tools, but there IS NO other INSIDE-browser firewall for Firefox, there are only other kinds of security tools. At least, BH FW DOES something -- it blocks content I need. I see, it can block. So, I find it cool, secure, a program done by good, ethically good, because protective people. I would not ever want people to give in to mafiosos who demand money from poor bakery owners. Instead, we need protection, but by a tech tool. In time, ANY user will open up his pglgui so much, and pglgui under Linux as of now DOES sadly NOT feature profiles for different blocklist sets, so bluehell IS of use and IS of help to us all. Thank You. Philadelphia Freedom! :)

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.1.1-signed). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

by pc supp on April 11, 2014 ·

HEY hi You super Makers of Blue Hell Hellish Psycho Marylin M cool FW (Marylin is cool, not "charlie"- yea chaplin yea not manson boo).

So here ma "review": Your Firewall is SO automatical, it has NO options as of yet. I don't say I want 1000 options. But I do need a whitelist - namely, for an online music player which is in flash, which docks on to one's fb account, which I got running under Tor (and in Linux Mint Petra :). I only had to set Cookies to be allowed to be taken by visited sites, the most secure setting of FIREFOX, the Clint-Eastwood-flown Russian stolen Airplane -- no it did actually NOT either crash between china and australia, our Firefox, LOL, neither was it aliens. And Googie Google Chrome is okay and real cool. No, I only say, all other security plugins for Mozilla[tm] Firefox[tm] work with sound-outputting flash-sites, such as "NoScript", which has a whitelist element in its excellent options, and HTTPS can be deactivated, though it does not work with special sites, HTTPS, but I would say, BH FW could protect all of us even more than "only" when we got pglgui or peerblock and antivir (in windoof) or ClamTK, and in windoofie, spybot search and destroy 1.6 or even version 2 of it. No, BH FW gives MORE security INSIDE the browser. And I do say, it is my favorite of ALL plugins. Ah, the sound continues. Because: I turned sadly OFF, had to, my BH FW plugin, easily doable, but I AM SAD. IT MUST have a whitelist. Because thus, all other inside-browser content is blocked except to those sites we want AND: It could even feature an off- and on-turnable LOGGING element, where like in pglgui or peerblock, we see, "WHAT comes in and out", so to say, which connections are requested either from our pc, of from the net. I am telling you, people are thankful for protections. This will in the future extend to our own actual body. Don't be afraid, poor normal good non-violent people, but be strong. We got it. So. Against evil. Against fanaticism and injustice, -- by technical means of trying to protect the innocent, a quote from Robocop. By the way those new changing themes of FF are SO great. It's better than any background changer for the desktop, since we all got the browser open. Chrome IS "more solid" for website flash authoring than Firefox as of now. That can change. Under Linux, firefox is good as a client thingy. Improve, Firefox, and be lenient to your own employees. Goodluck. I am with You Fellas. I luv USA, and period, say what you will. :) Shalom. ! :)

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.1.1-signed).