Rated 4 out of 5 stars

by Champs-Élysées on April 28, 2015 ·

This is an excellent extension, it's very useful for anyone who wants to keep an exact copy of a page, but it's a shame we can not open our mobile MAFF files created on the desktop. Could you please providing support for Firefox mobile?

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (3.1.0.1-signed). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

by Champs-Élysées on Dec. 23, 2014 ·

This is very ussful, but cannot support Android device(s), especially for MAFF file(s) if save them in the mobile, please add mobile support.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (3.0.3.1-signed). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

by Champs-Élysées on Dec. 23, 2014 ·

This is very helpful, and using this addon save page in MAFF format will be smaller than MHT format when save the same page, but this addon cannot support mobile device, I found I can't open MAFF file in mobile divice(s), so I require for mobile support.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (3.0.3.1-signed). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

by Champs-Élysées on Aug. 25, 2013 ·

I hope your extentions will be compatible with Firefox mobile.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (3.0.0.1-signed). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

by Champs-Élysées on June 29, 2013 ·

I've been very plasure with this add-on for some time, but have had some recent problems. My questions are:

1. I'm using Firefox 22.0 and found that MAF 2.0.9 cannot save page(s) directly in the Private Window. Why not save archive in the Private Window?
2. Using MAF 2.0.9, I found it cannot display original location when I open MHT file, but this format have "Content-Location" preference to note the original location. Why can't display the MHT's original location?
3. After save page in archive as MHT in MAF 2.0.9, the archive sometimes make IE10 crash, and MHT can't choose character encoding before save the page, but IE10 can choose character encoding. Why not support more encodings?
4. When MAF 2.0.9 output an archive, Firefox will hang at several time. Why is this so?

If you prefer, please reply here.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (2.0.9.1-signed). 

by Paolo Amadini (Developer) on July 4, 2013 ·

Thanks for reporting these issues, I'm working for resolving number 1 and number 2. For the three issues mentioned in number 3 and 4, you're welcome to provide more details through the feedback page (http://maf.mozdev.org/feedback.html) so that they can be better investigated.