부가 기능
웹사이트를 빠르고 자유롭게 누빌 수 있는 Mozilla Firefox를 다운로드하면 이곳에서 수천가지 부가 기능을 사용하실 수 있습니다!
닫기Merriam-Webster에 대한 검토
전체 검토: 61개
5점중 5점 받음
Friendly-user and fast.
5점중 5점 받음
Siempre encuentro una respuesta satisfactoria!!
5점중 5점 받음
this is very convenient, especially when I can also have a dictionary's user account to bookmark fav words!
5점중 5점 받음
A major, trusted dictionary that describes language rather than prescribing it (like the Oxford English Dictionary) does, webster's dictionary is authoritative without attempting to control the English language according to the wishes of elite, conservative lexicographers.
This add-on takes me straight to the page of the definition, saving me two pages: the search page and the half-a-definition page that I think contains ads I've blocked. Therefore, it saves me considerable time and bandwidth on mobile Internet.
The pages are faster to load and freer of junk than thoseof Dictionary.com, but could be cleaner: it would be nice to have less 'Did You Know?'-style rubbish and less advertisement -- but it's not too bad. I'm guessing the paid service is probably cleaner, more comprehensive and more configurable -- there's no such thing as a free lunch, or not often, anyway.
This lunch comes with no added poisonous propaganda (to my knowledge), minimal packaging and high nutrition.
========================================
To rebut a couple of other reviews: 'American English, not English' -- I'm guessing it lists British English usages too. And many users will be American -- death to pretentious xenophobic snobbery.
'Dictionary.com is better' -- it's bloated and I think the Webster's in that is the 1913 one. Dictionary.com has many dictionaries, some of which are not trustworthy. I'd rather get results straight from the dictionary I trust without unreliable or outdated garbage to sift through.
Doesn't work with Ubuntu? It's working with Iceweasel 17.0.0.10 on Debian 7. :->
Takes you to an ad page? It doesn't do that to me.
5점중 1점 받음
I tried to install this search engine, as such good use I obtained in the past.
I am using MFF 25.0 on Ubuntu 13.10 but can't install this search engine now, a window pops up with the message "Please use a Mozilla compatible software such as Firefox".
Unbelievable.
5점중 5점 받음
An excellent search engine!
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
Saves me time, goes straight to the entry for the word I'm looking for.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
Works very well. Saves the trouble of going to MW's website. The poor ratings are for ridiculous things.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
dj1917 - These Reviews are for the add-on, not the dictionary. You may or may not agree with how Merriam-Webster itself works, but do not penalize the Add-On with a bad rating because of that. The author of the add-on did not write the dictionary, just the code to efficiently redirect to the dictionary.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
Good source for quick definitions.
>American English, not English.
So? We are very sorry that we also have dictionaries for our particular idiom.
5점중 4점 받음
works well
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 1점 받음
American English, not English.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
works perfectly
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 3점 받음
Screenshot please.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
This is a good add-on. I had no issues with it not opening the definition page for the word I selected. As a writer, I have used m-w.com as an online dictionary for years after finding discrepancies and errors using other dictionaries. Yes, they do have ads and registered services to offer, but that is a small inconvenience to suffer for the volume of free and ACCURATE information they offer. My only regret is waiting so long to get this add-on.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
Minus the occasional invite to sign up for the unabridged version, I find I trust this dictionary over many others on the Internet. While Merriam-Webster does not have the sprawling etymologies of the OED, it has the correct connotations and usages of words. Although the Merriam-Webster site is frequently bogged down with advertisements, the add-on works quite flawlessly.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
Fantastic - I use this from the Firefox search box. For Google I use my home page.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 5점 받음
It's annoying that most of these reviews are focused on Merriam Webster's usability and not the add-on itself. The add-on works great!
As for Dictionary.com, only word wimps use that--it's frequently inaccurate because it uses non-standard dictionaries. Merriam Webster's site is annoying to browse, but at least you're getting correct definitions. I alternate between using Merriam Webster at work (it's our company's standard) and the Oxford English Dictionary at home (it's a much better resource but uses British spellings. While access isn't free, most library systems subscribe to it and I access it through mine).
5점중 5점 받음
Since Merriam-Webster is the industry standard, and I prefer not to take my chances with faulty and incomplete definitions and references, this is what I use. If you want inaccurate definitions and spellings, there are plenty of them out there.
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.5점중 1점 받음
Either it doesn't work with Flock or I'm missing something. Nothing on right click and see no option for toolbar etc. In fact, although attempting to re-install it results in a pop-up saying it's already there, I cannot see it listed in Flock's add-on extensions or plug-ins at all! So no clue how to uninstall it. Pronounce, however, works perfectly! Shame, as I rarely need help pronouncing words and hate having to jump to merriam-webster.com to grab the odd definition. Had high hopes! Pronounce will be a boon for my youngest child, however!
이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (20080326) 버전에 대한 것입니다.모음집을 제작하시려면 Mozilla 부가 기능 계정이 있어야 합니다.
아니면 현재 사용중인 계정으로 로그인 하세요
