Rated 5 out of 5 stars

I don't know why everyone is complaining about the developer or the extension. This extension does exactly what it's supposed to do, and that is to comply with the IETF's RFC 1845. It supports text sig blocks and also more complex HTML sig blocks the way I would expect it to support them. In other words, it works.

Regardless of what people think about this extension not supporting top posting, it works as it was intended to work and, for the most part, works well. You shouldn't drop your rating because you don't like bottom posting. After all, bottom posting is still the Internet e-mail standard. Suppose you like interleaved posting. Are you going to rate this extension lower because it doesn't support interleaved posting? Interleaved posting, just like top posting, isn't part of RFC 1845, either.

I'm not sure about this, but I believe top posting was propagated by Outlook and it top posted due to a bug, not by design. Imagine buggy software coming from Micro$oft!

Be that as it may, I think most people top post because that is the way Outlook worked and they got used to it. Plain and simple.

An RFC is not a standard. It's a recommendation. So maybe this developer is a little opinionated. The fact of the matter is that, in Internet e-mail parlance, a signature always appears at the very end of an e-mail and is always preceded by two dashes followed by a new line code. E-mail servers, if configured properly, recognize the double dash followed by a new line code as the beginning of a signature block, or the beginning of the end of an e-mail.

The developer could, if he wanted, support top posting by developing code that would insert a signature block without prepending two dashes followed by a new line code, perhaps prepending only a blank line or some other codes (like a double equal sign or double tilde) that an e-mail server would not interpret as a true signature block. That is how Evolution, the Mac version of Outlook developers chose to implement top posting. He could also support interleaved posting, too, if he were so inclined. It probably wouldn't be too much more difficult to write that logic than the logic to support top posting.

Many of the IETF's RFCs were written in the early-to-mid 1990s when many people used dial-up and people paid their ISPs by the minute. It was more efficient to read e-mails from top-to-bottom because the natural flow was preserved by bottom posting. Corporate America uses top posting partly because of Outlook's bug but also because the most recent and relevant information appears at the top of a business e-mail; if someone needs to know the history of the communication, he or she knows enough to read the e-mail from the bottom up. There's really no big deal.

Not that my opinion means anything, but I think many of the IETF's RFCs that date back to the "beginning" of the general public's use of the Internet need to be revisited, especially those that make recommendations for Internet e-mail.

Maybe Achim will read this review and have second thoughts about his stance... and, then again, maybe he won't.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.5). 

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

The fact that you have to create the signatures as files manually is a big drawback.
I created my signatures as UTF8 files using textedit on the mac, but when i insert them the æøå charectores are encoded incorrectly. Editing the files and saving them in a differet format didn't change the signatures (i pressed the edit button in the extension), picking a different file didn't change it, even on reboot the signature still was the same when i originaly picked the file.
Bottom posting is also a big issue.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.5). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Good tool, would give 5 star if signature would be added below the reply, and not below all previous messages. Needs an option for this at the settings.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

Works fine for adding all types of signatures. However the only reason for me using it is that it is in my case faster to copy paste the signature to the location I want it that to type it in (I'm using a more complex HTML signature).

I am "forced" to use this until me or someone else creates a signature addon that really works well.

It would be a five star review if it would allow you to top post and put the signature below your reply. The fact that this does not work makes it a three star review. And the fact that the author of this very good add-on is so set on the fact that top posting is bad and ugly even though it is the de-facto standard in many countries. In this conviction seems to ignore the major public demand for a signarure add-on that works just makes me annoyed and therefore just the two stars...

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

I agree- it would be more useful if it would insert at the cursor point rather than the end of the email. I stopped using it because it's faster to type than to scroll, cut, paste, etc. My signature needs to be with the most recent part of the email, not at the bottom where the beginning thread is.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Very good

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 5 out of 5 stars

No mail client can be called "complete" without a random signature feature. Thank you for adding it to TB!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Not sure why there is an autoswitch for recipients but not for senders. Would be useful to have a autoswitch options for signatures based on the sender address/account.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

It would be nice if it would switch according to which address book was showing or which address book a recipient was in

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

Good - thanks for the extension. One problem - the added signatures disappear when TB crashes. It's a real pain to have to go back and re-add the signatures all the time.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Would be a whole lot better if you could have the option to insert at the cursor point rather than the endd of the message.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Overall works as advertised, I guess, but I'd like it a whole lot better if it would put the signature in the same place I specify for auto-quoting placement in Thunderbird's Account Settings / Composition & Addressing -- in particular, above the quote as others have mentioned.

Another improvement would be for it to support different settings for different email accounts. One size doesn't fit all...

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 2 out of 5 stars

An useless add-on for people who keep long discussions through mails because of its signature insertion point which is only at the bottom of the reply. Unfortunately, for me, I can't use it like this. Otherwise excellent extension, if you like the signature at the end of mail it works very good.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Essentially a great extension ... Unfortunately, having the signature appear at the bottom renders it practically useless.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Nice idea and a good start, but it could be easier to use. It needs an option to retrieve program output directly without writing shell scripts to do all the work for it.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Unfortunately useless if your sig is at the top below your reply - like most people do - because it puts it at the bottom. Please fix this!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Needs to allow signatures at the top, as an option.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars

I use this to change the signature based upon the recipient or mailing list, and it works as advertised. And since I think top-posting is a bad habit, this add-on helps me to break that habit.

The FAQ helped me understand how the add-on works and to resolve the line break issue.

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

would be just what I was looking for IF (as other said) it could add signature not only at the bottom at replies.

Please fix it and I get back for a 5 star rating

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4). 

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Unfortunately useless if your sig is at the top below your reply - like most people do - because it puts it at the bottom. Please fix this!

Otherwise looks great for bottom sig people. Wish I could use it!

This review is for a previous version of the add-on (1.6.4).