5점중 5점 받음

작성: Nurien, 날짜: 3월 27, 2012 ·

Thank you very much for fixing this bug, whoever did this to Firefox should be fired.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: MySh, 날짜: 3월 27, 2012 ·

Very needed extension. Fixes bug, which is considered for some reason to be "feature" by Mozilla.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Ikaruseijin, 날짜: 3월 26, 2012 ·

I have no clue why FireFox thinks that the current method of displaying images is a good one. It's bizarre. Thank you for this bug fix that the build team seem to be unwilling or unable to do.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Matthew Ru, 날짜: 3월 24, 2012 ·

Works as described and fixes what Mozilla has RUINED in the latest feature update. Thanks much for this, I will be using this forever.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Curious Mew, 날짜: 3월 24, 2012 ·

I agree w/Paul, very essential. It was troubling to see my Google images showing up in the center of the webpage, and not knowing how to change it.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Paul Sinnett, 날짜: 3월 24, 2012 ·

Essential. Without this you'd be unable to view images containing transparency.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Terria, 날짜: 3월 24, 2012 ·

Thank you very much for this :-)

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Nufros, 날짜: 3월 24, 2012 ·

this add-on does a great job reversing FF's latest mistake..

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: FFUserThinkingAboutSwitchingToAnotherBrowser, 날짜: 3월 22, 2012 ·

This has to be one of the most ridiculous changes in Firefox, ever. Does Mozilla have *nothing* better to work on? What was the need to break something that was working absolutely fine? Even if something needed to be 'fixed', why not provide an about:config entry for it?

This add-on should not have been required AT ALL, and as mentioned by others, I am not at all happy to have to add more bloat to undo Mozilla's bone-headed and ill-considered decisions.

That said, I rate this add-on a perfect 5/5 for doing *exactly* what it says, and thank the developer for undoing what some idiot at Mozilla came up with.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: efreak1, 날짜: 3월 21, 2012 ·

I didn't like the dark gray background that by default was added to Firefox 11. I did however love the centering effect. With this addon I can change the color to a neutral grey and still keep the image centered. Thank you so much!

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: maff, 날짜: 3월 21, 2012 ·

Works as expected, thanks a lot!

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Raccoon, 날짜: 3월 20, 2012 ·

YEAY! Yet another Undo Addon cluttering up my extensions list. Why have we forsaken about:config? FYI, centering totally breaks the internet. Not everyone uses full-screen view, some of us bring multiple windows open and overlap them just right to view multiple reference images. Now I have to size these windows, too, to get rid of the gray! GAH!

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: tiger78, 날짜: 3월 20, 2012 ·

This useful tweak should of course not have been necessary. It reminds me of Ye Olde Dayes (mid-1990s) before style sheets etc, when A Browser unilaterally decided to use a grey background instead of white for general web pages (or was it the other way around??)
In this present situation, I have hundreds of images of *objects* photographed against a white background, often tightly cropped to save file space. The 'off-black' background now unilaterally applied makes a complete travesty of simple display of these items. (The centring is less of a problem.)
In general, display of 'an image' on a web page is not the same as the display of a video (which is pretty much a self-contained object in itself). Presumably the Firefox people were thinking only of a framed 'photo album' approach... But then, why not use a proper black?
Not thought through, not thought through...

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: rigrigrig, 날짜: 3월 20, 2012 ·

Registered just to thank you for making this addon! Thank you very much!!! The change of the background was completely unnecessary.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Danilo Syrtis-Ardais, 날짜: 3월 19, 2012 ·

This is an absolutely perfect and essential add-on that shouldn't have to exist: because the geniuses at Firefox shouldn't have made such a bone-headed move in the first place and then having done so they should have allowed the user to turn it off.

At first I thought it was a website I was viewing pictures on that had done this, then I saw it was Firefox and I IMMEDIATELY looked for a solution.

Plus, you require no restart either. I'd like to buy you a cup of coffee or a beer. Whichever you prefer. And if you can't decide I'll buy you both.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: pip25, 날짜: 3월 19, 2012 ·

Thanks for this. Firefox once again shot itself in the foot with a completely random and ill-thought UI change. >_>

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: prtoday, 날짜: 3월 17, 2012 ·

Thanks to the "add on" I'm saved! But here's another reason why "centering all images" and "adding a background color" - while "aesthetically nice," RUINS the point of web-hosting images without any adornments: With the background color added and the image centered - you CANNOT hold down the left button on your mouse and copy and paste the image into an e-mail or into an online HTML composer like what you would use, for example, when you sell something at eBay. Crazy!

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Wolf, 날짜: 3월 17, 2012 ·

The change without the ability to revert, or even change color code obnoxious. I really like Firefox and prefer it over every other browser. Still, I can't hope understand where the logic behind this choice came from. This thing fixes everything,though. Without this add-on, I'd be searching for a different browser as Firefox-like as possible. Perhaps it's over dramatic, but I would've been very sad to do so. I hope they don't break it again, I don't like being afraid of Firefox developer decisions.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: Moo?, 날짜: 3월 17, 2012 ·

The new look is terrible, seriously don't fix something that's not fcking broken. The grey background destroys any "transparent" pictures such as this:
http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/attachment.php?attachmentid=399441
terrible.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다. 

5점중 5점 받음

작성: bnightm, 날짜: 3월 17, 2012 ·

Got Firefox 11 today. Found this add-on less than 15 minutes later. Does exactly what I expected from Firefox and was unable to do in about:config.

When I open an image directly, I expect to see a non-styled page with just the image, so as to differentiate it from the website it is hosted on. The new behavior made that impossible and therefore this add-on a must-have for me.

이 검토는 현재 부가 기능의 이전 (1.0.1-signed.1-signed) 버전에 대한 것입니다.